HP w22
March 8th, 2007 | by Ian Bell
|
Average user rating from 10 users |
To Tanmay
by Ian Bell on Mar 9th, 2007 at 9:11 AM:
While it's true that vertical scan frequency is not supposed to be an issue with LCD monitors because they simply lack the phosphors of a CRT monitor, the vertical scan frequency does have a maximum refresh rate (in the case of the w22, 75Hz) to support motion, although it will not refresh static images.
No Knowledge !
by Tanmay on Mar 9th, 2007 at 1:23 AM:
The reviewer says " HP recommends that you use this monitor at the 1680x1050 resolution at 60hz, which is a very low refresh rate using the analog cable. You would have to lower the resolution even lower, at 1440x900 to get a faster 75Hz refresh rate."
This is an LCD Monitor ! There's nothing such as refresh rate in an LCD Monitor there's no difference in 60Hz or 75Hz as Technology of an LCD is totally different. I say read this : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Refresh_rate
Get the Dell instead
by John S. on Mar 8th, 2007 at 3:08 PM:
This review finally puts it into perspective. I got one of these and thought it must be a good or at least decent monitor since it came with my PC, I was wrong. It takes forever to warm up, and since it doesn't adjust, I had to rig it up to see it best. I still use it because I didnt pay anything, but if I had to, I would have picked a Dell monitor.
Avoid This Monitor
by Janice on Mar 8th, 2007 at 1:34 PM:
Wow, thanks for an honest review finally. I got this monitor with a PC package we bought, and it's horrid. The colors always look washed out and the built-in speakers sound terrible, plus you cannot add a subwoofer. I was considering a Samsung monitor and should have asked for that instead.
Write Your Review
Your review should be relevant to this item. An email address is required for verification purposes only and will not be displayed. HTML is not allowed in comments. If you want to discuss the product rather than write your own review, visit the forums.


Garbage
by Tina on Mar 18th, 2007 at 7:39 PM: