Sennheiser CX300 User Reviews November 13th, 2006 | by Brandon King




Average user rating from 23 users

1-5 of 23   |   Next 5 User Reviews

NIce ear phone, if it is genuine!

by Nina on Jul 26th, 2009 at 12:47 AM:

User Score: 8.png I owned 2 pairs of CX300, one from Apple store @HKD699 (USD85) and one from street @HKD298 (USD35). They have very similar, if not identical, packing and outlook. Sounds from them appear similar, particularly the character, and the mid & high ranges. But the bass is definitely better from the one cost more. I saw many posts on the web that there are faked Sen earphone, particularly the CX series as many other brands are sharing the same externals. So to secure your spending, make sure you get it from a reliable dealer. The CX300-II does look different and may solve the problem.

Awesome

by Superficial on May 22nd, 2009 at 3:44 PM:

User Score: 10.png I had a pair of CX 300's but when they broke ( 1.5 year of heavy use) I bought AKG K324 P, then I realized how good they were. Very deep, head shaking lows, clear and precise mid and highs. AKG's were supposed to be higher class but they are nowhere near the sound quality of the Senns. Connect them to a PC with a decent sound card and you'll see what I mean, no distortion, no let go until you the feel pain in you head, 110+ dB. Enjoy !

good one

by Himanshu on Nov 12th, 2008 at 9:33 AM:

User Score: 10.png I have compared Bose earphones, Shure e2c, e3c, and the Sennheiser CX300's. These are the best earphones I have ever used. The bass and sound pressure level plus crystal clear mids and highs trick your ears into feeling like you are live in concert. Absolutely the best and super comfortable. Also I have ripped these earphones out of my ears at the gym many times, sweated into them from running marathons, and they stand up to the best.

Solid stuff

by Jo on Oct 29th, 2008 at 1:10 PM:

User Score: 8.png Firstly... the sound quality for these phones are very decent considering the category they're in. They're not quite earbuds but not ear canal phones either. For those who complain about "terrible" sound from this it is very likely that you simply don't have a good fit (fit is quite important for you to achieve the right sound). In particular an earlier review about the asymmetrical cord getting in the way... well of course it would if you were wearing the cord in front (STUPID.)... asymmetricals are meant for the cord to loop and rest over your shoulders so that the cord is now behind your neck and out of the way. Otherwise I find the cx300 to have very reasonable amounts of base (though somewhat lacking in color), slightly muddled mids, with decent highs. As for price... there are tons of places to browse for cheaper ones, you simply have to be careful not to buy the fakes floating around. Find a more trusted seller/retailer.

Very fragile

by Sam on Mar 7th, 2008 at 10:02 AM:

User Score: 5.png I saw these earphones at the store like 110$! I had bought mine 25$ and let me tell you that for 110$, I could find a better one. The quality is not worth the price and the buds they give you are bad compared to other noise-cancelling buds.

However, the design is pretty nice and very light but its fragility and because of the cold, they went from stereo to mono!

So my verdict: nice earphones but not worth the price

1-5 of 23   |   Next 5 User Reviews

Write Your Review

Your review should be relevant to this item. An email address is required for verification purposes only and will not be displayed. HTML is not allowed in comments. If you want to discuss the product rather than write your own review, visit the forums.











Join our newsletter to keep up to date on the latest Digital Trends content like Videos, Reviews, News and more delivered directly to your email!


Plus, get early access to contests and specials from our partners. Join today!





Loading...