Digital Trends

Canon Optura 600 October 24th, 2005 | by David Elrich

Conclusion

As of this date, this is the best iteration of combination camcorder/digital still camera I have tested.  The quality of the MiniDV videos is very accurate, with nice contrast and lifelike colors. And the stills are the best yet but it must be pointed out, I have not tried the trio of 5MP camcorders available (we'll test them as soon as possible). The only negative is the fact the videos are tape-based not disc so you lose all of the benefits of DVD camcorders (thumb nails for each scene, jumping from point to point, simply popping it into your DVD player for playback and so on). You also have to worry about recording over scenes but a modicum of caution eliminates that potential disaster. Another big plus of tape are the number of affordable editing programs available. I used Microsoft's Movie Maker 2, a free download. When you add it all up (and subtract the minuses), this is a very good two-in-one device. Although pricey (around $1,000) it's definitely an Editor's Choice. Yet if convenience isn't your goal, you can always go cheap and purchase a good-enough MiniDV camcorder like the Canon ZR200 for 350 bucks, a 4MP Canon digicam like the A520 for $200 and be far ahead of the game. But forget about any cool factor whatsoever and trying your luck on eBay.

Pros:

• MiniDV quality is much better than DVD camcorders
• Best-yet digital still quality
• Extensive scene modes and manual adjustments
• Excellent battery life

Cons:

• Tape format is slower to use than DVD
• Fairly steep learning curve
• No built-in lens cover
• No accessory hot shoe
• Deep body may cause hand strain